Women use their clothing as an extension of their personalities in
order to portray specific aspects of femininity. During my visit to
Regal Cinema, I observed a couple of twenty-somethings having lunch.
The girl was dressed in a modest, cream colored blouse, a structured
jacket in navy, and a pair of dark jeans. Her boyfriend was wearing a
plaid button down and jeans. She spoke quietly, yet lively. This could
be seen by the laughter which her speech would evoke. Also, she
publicly displayed her affection very minimally. I took notice of a
group of six jewelry store employees, one was female, and the rest were
male. The male employees would address each other as a group and laugh
and joke all together, but the female employee would address each male
individually. She would seductively, touch their hands, while looking
into their eyes and smiling. She wore a very fitted white blouse, a
black bra, a skin tight, charcoal miniskirt, black pumps, and a belt
under her chest to accentuate her breasts. Both of these women were
emulating feminine gender roles. The flirtatious girl wore the hat of
the "bad girl" or a "harlot", while the other would have been
considered a "good girl". Still, women have portrayed their
stereotypical roles for centuries. 19th century Harlots would use their
dress to draw attention to themselves. They would wear bells on their
ankles, and brightly colored, loud clothing, while the clothing worn by
other women of that time period was used to portray the image of a
domestic goddess. They used corsets to cinch their waists, hoop skirts
to create an hourglass figure which referenced their fertility, and
aprons to show the domesticity.
Family dynamics in a America in 2009 are different between
different races. Latino men seem more engaged with their children than
Anglo men. During my time at Holiday Park, I observed different
interactions between parents of different races
and their children. I noticed that the
white parents would hardly take notice of their children. In fact, it
seemed most of them were more concerned with their cell phones, than
their kids. A White mother sat and watched her six year old play on the
jungle-gym, looking bored and uninterested. The only White father at
the park that day opted to spend his daughter's play time eyeballing a
female jogger and chatting on the phone instead of taking advantage of
the time he could have been spending with his little girl. The complete
opposite was true for a young Hispanic father
who spent the day running around playing football and soccer with his
two young boys. This could be a result of the strong culture that
continues to bind Hispanics together while White families are becoming
less and less interactive on that intimate family level. It seems
White
people have acted similarly for centuries. This can be seen by
comparing the family dynamics of the English Europeans who came to
settle in America and the Native Americans who were already living
here. The Europeans wanted to have their own private estates where one
man would have many acres of his own land.The Natives, however, could
have had all the land they wanted yet they still chose to live close
together in communal living spaces.
Tamarack beach explores a woman’s gender and sexuality as a social trap in America. At Tamarack beach the women there regardless of age are wearing a bikini or something similar and without a doubt something revealing. The more skin being shown at Tamarack reflects on the amount of lurking eyes from males and even females. The women look and judge every other female competitors outfit as if they were on stage being given a rank for epidermal friendliness. And when looking closely at the reactions of every new female addition to Tamarack a distinct but covert scowl given away only by the slightest arching of the brows is an indicator for disapproval of an unwanted outfit or perhaps jealousy of a better one or body for that matter. In other words females at Tamarack dress not for themselves but for social approval and as a result it‘s become competitive. However, unlike today’s skimpy apparel, women clothing styles of early America consisted of hoopskirts, chemises, and corsets. Although corsets were tight they were not like today’s counterparts which are smaller and usually only seen in people’s sexual desires. This casual clothing style of the past isn’t destroyed completely in today’s attire but has been transformed into a sexual outfit for females but worn for males. Proving that females and the clothes they wear are just objects for the male audience who undoubtedly yield the responsibility for creation of the ideal American woman. It seems that with every year of American history is another layer being taken off of women and more social pressure. Every woman going to the beach or any beach for that matter is expected to have a bikini on even if they prefer another kind of bathing suit. Social pressure from clothing and sexually oriented magazines along with television embed the ideal American woman at the beach as someone wearing revealing outfits and representing a fit slender body. This kind of pressure manifests itself in American women, that, when at the beach it is a requirement to have the unmatched characteristics of a slender body with augmented breasts and a spherical behind. Although most women aren’t genetically built with those qualities, American beaches such as Tamarack beach uphold this perceived notion of women. This system of ideal women and pressurized gender clothing leaves a gap between those that are luckily enough to maintain the body and outfit to those who aren’t capable. Leaving the incapable to social ridicule while the lucky few bathe in America’s ideal glory. Ironically obtaining these bodies is usually unhealthy and because of male domination in the clothing industry to demand more skin women in America are pressured to do so or remain to most men, social flaws.
Recently attending a local church service, I noticed the amount of children present and how child indoctrination into any religion has been an ongoing dilemma in early America history as well as today. Observing the children, like any child, these children didn’t want to be here and probably were forced to attend by their parents. Some tried to escape the ongoing preaching by sneaking a game via game boy or texting on their phone while others weren’t so lucky. Early America children didn’t have these diversions from boredom like today’s technology and were incapable to enjoy the freedom of independent thought because their families tradition was that particular religion, therefore since it was their families it was theirs-theirs to pass down to their child and so on. Family life in America has differed because of the increasing technology and laws passed since then. Today people aren’t so afraid to stray away from their fixed family beliefs systems and choose what they believe is right all while successfully obtaining independent thoughts, not family thoughts. Early American religion was a much bigger influencing device on the lifestyle of the family than it is today but even though religion and family life aren’t as strictly enforced in the household doesn’t mean today’s America doesn’t follow the same principle of child indoctrination. Simply bringing a child to church, like I witnessed, is indoctrinating them into that particular religion without letting them explore other belief systems. Parents in America want their children to believe what they believe so they can have a pyramid effect on their family tradition and religious views. Although preserving a family tradition such as religion isn’t necessarily a bad thing, in order for it to work, child indoctrination must be accomplished and therefore leaving children in America narrow minded and usually hindered of independent thoughts because of it.